Even the weakest force, when infinitely multiplied, has literally no limit to its power. The G-EM union/field is counterintuitive – even ridiculous, absurd, impossible to some people – since gravitation is so weak (EM is 10^36 times as powerful, and the Strong Nuclear Force is a hundred times stronger again ie 10^38 times as powerful). Rearrangement could be achieved by a quantum-scale version of gravitational lensing, which can split the image of an astronomical object into several images. Virtual particles and their produced digits are included in this rearrangement, to vary particle mass). This union of the different waveforms could be made possible by rearrangement of gravitons' binary digits (bits) into the bits of the particles constituting the other 3 forces (surrounding space-time's While the latter part has been retained, the fundamental force is now seen as a gravitational-electromagnetic (G-EM) union. My ideas initially suggested gravitation (G) is the universe's only fundamental force and that electromagnetism (EM), as well as the strong and weak nuclear forces, are products of G. From there, Einstein developed his photoelectric effect (when quanta or photons of light shine on certain metals, electrons are released and can form an electric current). Albert Einstein postulated that Planck's quanta were real physical particles (what we now call photons), not just a mathematical fiction. In particular, Planck assumed that electromagnetic radiation can only be emitted or absorbed in discrete packets, called quanta. At the start of the 20th century, physicist Max Planck derived the correct solution by making some strange (for the time) assumptions. ^ The ultraviolet catastrophe, also called the Rayleigh–Jeans catastrophe, is a failure of classical physics to predict observed phenomena: it can be shown that a blackbody - a hypothetical perfect absorber and radiator of energy - would release an infinite amount of energy, contradicting the principles of conservation of energy and indicating that a new model for the behaviour of blackbodies was needed. So imaginary time and the Complex Number Plane might find applications undreamt of today. The idea of the quantum was originally developed by Max Planck purely as a mathematical convenience^, but it's been part of our reality for over a century. Historically, mathematics often finds practical application in physics. This article strives towards that revolution by addressing many topics – including dark energy, dark matter, black holes, radioactive dating, gravity, mathematics, the shape of space-time, and imaginary time. He believes that this is a great time in human history for the revolution to occur. This is the time for radical, new ideas” (theoretical physicist Neil) Turok concluded in early October, 2015. “We need a very different view of basic physics. So I'll post my ideas here.A paradigm shift in science is a fundamental change in its concepts and practices. She has published extensively on Arctic and northern governance, human security, and Indigenous economic development.These ideas are universally rejected by science journals either without explanation, or because I don't know how to write in a manner they consider acceptable. But in my opinion, the science is still valid. She has held several positions at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, the International Centre for Northern Governance and Development, Canada and the University of the Arctic. Heather Exner-Pirot is Research Associate at the Observatoire de la politique et la sécurité de l'Arctique (OPSA), Canada and the Managing Editor of the Arctic Yearbook. He is the author of over 300 scientific publications including The Global Arctic Handbook (2018), Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate (2016), and Security and Sovereignty in the North Atlantic (2014). Lassi Heininen is the Editor of the Arctic Yearbook, Research Director at the Institute for Atmospheric and Earth Research at the University of Helsinki, Finland, Professor of International Relations at Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Russia, and Professor of Arctic Politics at the University of Lapland (retired).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |